Depicting whether 3D Printing Is Suited †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Depicting whether 3D Printing Is Suited. Answer: Depicting why 3D printing is mainly called addictive manufacturing: The addictive manufacturing is mainly identified as the overall process, which uses computing innovation for completing the task. The overall use of 3D printing is adequately supporting the idea additive manufacturing, which directly involves use of computing innovation. The main process this additive manufacturing is to increase the functions with the help of computing, where adequate improvement in communication, speed and assembly could be conducted efficient. In addition, 3D printing mainly involves all the three parts of additive manufacturing, as it needs only computer related information for designing and manufacturing the product. Furthermore, the additive manufacturing also supports all the relevant customisation that is needed by consumer, where changes in structure shapes could be conducted adequately by the manufacturer (Campbell et al., 2011). The 3D printing directly allows individual to manufacture what up with customisation according to the specific needs, which supports additive manufacturing criteria. In addition, 3D printing requires low wastage of produce and speedup manufacturing process, which is one of the basic measures that is needed by the additive manufacturing process. The additive manufacturing process also involves high end production or manufacturing process, which is defined to produce consumer goods. However, the overall additive manufacturing process which has low costing and capability are mainly identified as 3D printing machines. Theadditive manufacturing process has high manufacturing units, which could provide large numbers of products at short span. Nevertheless, 3D printing can only provide small amount of product in mediocre time. Therefore, it could be estimated that 3D printing in called additive manufacturing but is not able to produce large number of product at short span. Moreover, Cesaret ti et al., (2014) stated that the overall 3D printing directly supports maximum of the overall attributes of additive manufacturing, which mainly make 3D pricing an additive manufacturing process. Depicting whether 3D printing is suited for high or low volumes of production: From the evaluation of the current 3D printing machine, it could be understood that the overall innovation in the field is not adequately advanced for comparing it with traditional manufacturing process. Traditional manufacturing process may be able to provide high end products at low time, which is relatively less costly and are unable to provide consumers with adequate product. After evaluating the current scenario 3D printing machine is mainly suited for low volume products, as it is not evolved for supporting a continuous and high end production system. Furthermore it is also evaluated that the 3D printing systems overall cost, speed, and scalability, as compared to the traditional manufacturing process is not adequate for high end production. In this context, Costello et al., (2014) mentioned that 3D printing process is mainly suited for low end clay making process, which could be used by individuals. In addition, 3D printing process requires lot of time as it needs to build the product part by part by producing its different parts. Therefore, it could be identified that after seeing the improvement in current condition in 3D printing machine, it could be identified that use of low production system is adequate manufacturing process. The relevant production needs of a big manufacturer cannot be supported with 3D printing machine, as the relevant speed in manufacturing is not innovated in the current era. Lee et al., (2016) stated that seeing the improvements and increasing development in 3D manufacturing process, the day when traditional manufacturing process will become obsolete is not far. However, with 3D manufacturing process it is only able to produce products in models, which needs to be assembled afterwards. Thus, the hectic production system could be rejected by the manufacturers, as it increases the cost and completion time of the product. Depicting the situation in which 3D printing is most valuable: 3D printing is mainly valuable in different forms, is it current portrays itself as a consumer product, which could help in supporting their day to day needs. Currently 3D printing is being used among designers, engineers, automotive manufacturing, dental Labs, and hospitals. The overall identified consumers of 3D printing machines are relatively using the product for supporting its day to day news. The Automotive manufacturing facility is using the 3D printing machines to produce parts, which could be used in the production. Moreover, the designers are using 3D printing machines, as a developer of prototype for their overall design, which could provide higher accessibility to the customer regarding the innovative designs. Dental labs are mainly used 3D printing machines to Produce customise product on demand, which are needed by the consumers. McMenamin et al., (2014) argued that the investment process is not adequately complete where relevant improvement could be conducted for decr easing the completion time. The engineers mainly used 3D printing machine models and prototype which could help in defining the different stages of production that needs to be conducted for computer project. Lastly, the use of 3D machine in hospitals is mainly conducted to reproduce different organs, which are needed by different patients. Use of 3D printing machine is allowed major businesses to compensate for the shortage in their raw material or in some cases a whole human organ. Mendis, Lemley, Rimmer (2017) stated that USA doctors have successfully printed skin tissues with the help of 3D manufacturing process for burnt victims. The relevant 3D printing process could directly allow small production companies to customise the products according to the customers needs. This could eventually help in generating higher value from business, where the overall 3D manufacturing process could allow the company. Depicting the forecast of leading and investment research firms regarding 3D printing: The overall evaluation of leading research and investment firms relevant forecast for 3D printing activities could be identified. The companies directly stated the overall forecast of 3D printing machines, which could be used in high-end manufacturing process. In addition, the Goldman Sachs, Gartner and McKinsey have relatively stated a strong interest on the 3D printing machines, which are expected to revolutionise the overall production system that is currently being used by the manufacturing. This use of 3D printing machines could directly allow the manufacturing companies to produce the overall components and reduce the excessive costs from operations. Moon et al., (2014) mentioned that use of 3D printing machines could eventually allow the organisation to minimise the completion time of the project and produce all the relevant products. Therefore, it could be identified that 3D pricing machines have adequate future scope, which might allow manufacturing companies to improve thei r profitability by reducing cost and completion time. After seeing the overall value of the product in different system it could be understood that use of 3D machines could provide higher returns for investors. Therefore, the big investing companies have evaluated the 3D printing machine is one of the innovative products, which could revolutionise the manufacturing industry. Hence, seeing the value of overall 3D pricing machine the industry experts think that it could solve half of the problems, which are faced by the manufacturers in the current era. This could only mean that 3D printing machines could provide higher return by reducing the cost and completion time of a product (Park et al., 2015). Hence, the valuation of Goldman Sachs is mainly conducted on the basis of relevant improvements, which could be conducted in the 3D printing technology. Depicting how 3D printing can make some types of traditional manufacturing obsolete: The relevant evaluation of the 3D printing machine it directly identify the innovation, which might make the traditional manufacturing process obsolete. Moreover, the 3D pricing system does not have any kind of overhead costs, which is mainly implemented in the traditional manufacturing process. In addition, with the help of 3D printing machines the manufacturers could make complex designs, which was not possible previously in traditional manufacturing process. 3D printing machines are also able to have clean and energy efficient manufacturing process with adequate prototype developing technology, which is not possible in traditional manufacturing process. Moreover, from the evaluation of the 3D printing technology it could be identified that the system reduces cost for complex designs, high level of customisation, and reduced overhead cost (Radenkovic, Solouk Seifalian, 2016). These all benefits that are provided by the 3D printing system are not actually present in the traditional manufacturing process, which is why it will become obsolete. Therefore, afar understating the benefits that are provided by 3D printing system, it could be understood that it will directly affect the consumer sector division in businesses. The consumer section mainly needs high customisable products for the consumers. This 3D manufacturing process could change the production design according to the needs to the consumers, where it will replace the overall traditional manufacturing process. Relevant products such as jewellery, toys, footwear, clothes etc are the overall products, which could be made with the help of 3D printing machines (Ventola, 2014). There is relevant estimation, which is conducted by different researcher that by 2025, 3D printing technology will mainly support the overall consumer sector by producing highly customisable products. References: Campbell, T., Williams, C., Ivanova, O., Garrett, B. (2011). Could 3D printing change the world.Technologies, Potential, and Implications of Additive Manufacturing, Atlantic Council, Washington, DC. Cesaretti, G., Dini, E., De Kestelier, X., Colla, V., Pambaguian, L. (2014). Building components for an outpost on the Lunar soil by means of a novel 3D printing technology.Acta Astronautica,93, 430-450. Costello, J. P., Olivieri, L. J., Krieger, A., Thabit, O., Marshall, M. B., Yoo, S. J., ... Nath, D. S. (2014). Utilizing three-dimensional printing technology to assess the feasibility of high-fidelity synthetic ventricular septal defect models for simulation in medical education.World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery,5(3), 421-426. Lee, J. Y., Tan, W. S., An, J., Chua, C. K., Tang, C. Y., Fane, A. G., Chong, T. H. (2016). The potential to enhance membrane module design with 3D printing technology.Journal of Membrane Science,499, 480-490. McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., McHenry, C. R., Adams, J. W. (2014). The production of anatomical teaching resources using three?dimensional (3D) printing technology.Anatomical sciences education,7(6), 479-486. Mendis, D., Lemley, M., Rimmer, M. (2018). 3D Printing and Beyond: The Intellectual Property and Legal Implications Surrounding 3D Printing and Emerging Technology. Moon, S. K., Tan, Y. E., Hwang, J., Yoon, Y. J. (2014). Application of 3D printing technology for designing light-weight unmanned aerial vehicle wing structures.International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology,1(3), 223-228. Park, J. Y., Shim, J. H., Choi, S. A., Jang, J., Kim, M., Lee, S. H., Cho, D. W. (2015). 3D printing technology to control BMP-2 and VEGF delivery spatially and temporally to promote large-volume bone regeneration.Journal of Materials Chemistry B,3(27), 5415-5425. Radenkovic, D., Solouk, A., Seifalian, A. (2016). Personalized development of human organs using 3D printing technology.Medical hypotheses,87, 30-33. Ventola, C. L. (2014). Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses.Pharmacy and Therapeutics,39(10), 704. Weller, C., Kleer, R., Piller, F. T. (2015). Economic implications of 3D printing: Market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited.International Journal of Production Economics,164, 43-56. Xing, J. F., Zheng, M. L., Duan, X. M. (2015). Two-photon polymerization microfabrication of hydrogels: an advanced 3D printing technology for tissue engineering and drug delivery.Chemical Society Reviews,44(15), 5031-5039.